Antivenom treatment
Antivenom administration: practical approach
| Treatment step | Procedure | Comments |
| Sensitivity test | no | Apart from the rare cases of a pre-existing sensitivity, e.g. to horse serum, sensitivity tests (intradermal, intraconjunctival) have no predictive value for an antivenom reaction (Malasit et al. 1986) |
| Pre-medication | adrenaline s.c. | see 'Prevention' below. |
| Timing of antivenom |
When indicated, as quickly as possible. It is, however, "never too late if signs of systemic envenoming persist" (Warrell 2023) |
Local evenoming is most likely not reversible or preventable by antivenom if delayed by a few hours (Warrell 2023). |
| Mode of administration | i.v. | Antivenoms are most effective when administered i.v. - even F(ab) small fragment antivenoms; in rare cases antivenoms can be administered i.m.; however, this is associated with a loss of efficacy, and there is a danger of intramuscular bleeding in the case of envenoming with haemostatically active venom components; i.m. administration should thus only be applied if i.v. administration is not possible for technical reasons and pressure dressing appied after injection to control bleeding(Warrell 1990b); further exceptions: Chironex antivenom. |
| Route and speed of administration |
i.v. infusion with isotonic saline solution over 30–60 min i.v. "push"-injection over 10-20 minutes |
No difference in the incidence or severity of antivenom reactions. In the rural tropics the "push" injections has the advantage that it needs less equippment. (Warrell 2023) |
| Dose |
Children receive the same or a larger dose than adults. Repeated doses may be necessary. |
Information from the manufacturer is often based on mouse assays, which can differ from clinical results.
Recurrent envenoming was common when rapidly cleared Fab antivenoms were introduced: EchiFab, Micropharm, London, UK for envenoming by Nigerian saw-scaled viper, ProlongaTab, Micropharm for envenoming by Sri Lankan Russell's viper (D. russelli), and CroFab, BTG, London, UK for envenoming by American rattlesnakes. Possible mechanisims: (a) continued absorption of antivenom from the bite site after antivenom has been cleared or has complexed with venom and (b) redistribution of venom after dissociation of the venom-antivenom complexes (Warrell 2023).
|
| Precautions |
Monitoring of the patient during and after antivenom administration; constant monitoring during the first 10–15 min after the start of antivenom administration, continued for 3 hours at regular intervals (see below 'Antivenom reactions'); In the case of envenoming with impaired haemostasis ensuring that there is no persistent bleeding from the site of venipuncture, possibly compression bandage |
The likelihood of the occurrence of early severe antivenom reactions is greatest after the start of antivenom administration, however, so-called "early" reactions may also first appear after a period of hours; thus it is necessary to monitor the patient for several hours following antivenom administration |
| Identification and treatment of antivenom reactions | see below 'Antivenom reactions' | |
| Quality of and access to antivenoms | see published clinical trials and
WHO Snakebite Information and Data PlatformThere is a multitude of antivenoms produced on various levels of standards. Quality of and access to antivenoms at an appropriate standard vary widely globally. |
Great efforts are being undertaken to secure appropriate standards (GMP) and access for people in need: WHO: Snakebite envenoming -- A strategy for prevention and control |
Antivenom reactions: types, mechanisms, treatment
| Type/Characteristics | Mechanism | Treatment |
| Early anaphylactoid/anaphylactic reactions
approx. 10–180 minutes after starting antivenom treatment (Warrell 2023) |
The mechanisms have not yet been clearly elucidated;
|
followed by Antihistamines, e.g. chlorpheniramine maleate: adults 10 mg, children 0.2 mg/kg BW, slowly i.v. (Warrell 2023)
|
|
Mild reactions: urticaria, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, headache, fever (Malasit et al. 1986)
|
||
|
Pyrogenic reactions
|
Contamination of the antivenom during the manufacturing process. |
Reducing fever through cooling and antipyretics such as paracetamol (Warrell 2023). |
|
Signs and symptoms: fever, chills, vasodilatation, arterial hypotension (febrile seizures can occur in children) |
||
|
Late reactions (serum sickness)
|
Type III hypersensitivity |
Mild reaction
(Warrell 2023) |
|
Signs and symptoms: pruritus, urticaria, fever, arthralgia, lymphadenopathy, peri-articular swelling, albuminuria, neurological impairment (mononeuritis multiplex, rarely encephalopathy); The incidence and speed with which the reaction develops are greater the higher the dose of antivenom administered (Warrell 2023) |
Prevention
de Silva et al. (2011) Low-Dose Adrenalin, Promethazine, and Hydrocortisone in the Prevention of Acute Adverse Reactions to Antivenom Snakebite: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Tria (PLoS Med 8(5):e1000435.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000435): In total, 1,007 patients were randomized, using a 2×2×2 factorial design, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of adrenaline (0.25 ml of a 1:1,000 solution subcutaneously), promethazine (25 mg intravenously), and hydrocortisone (200 mg intravenously), each alone and in all possible combinations.
In total, 752 (75%) patients had acute reactions to antivenom: 9% mild, 48% moderate, and 43% severe; 89% of the reactions occurred within 1 h; and 40% of all patients were given rescue medication (adrenaline, promethazine, and hydrocortisone) during the first hour. Compared with placebo, adrenaline significantly reduced severe reactions to antivenom by 43% (95% CI 25–67) at 1 h and by 38% (95% CI 26–49) up to and including 48 h after antivenom administration; hydrocortisone and promethazine did not. Adding hydrocortisone negated the benefit of adrenaline.
Conclusions: Pretreatment with low-dose adrenaline was safe and reduced the risk of acute severe reactions to snake antivenom. This may be of particular importance in countries where adverse reactions to antivenom are common, although the need to improve the quality of available antivenom cannot be overemphasized.